April 10, 2025

Toronto News Daily

The Most up to date Local News in Toronto City

March 27, 2025 Carolyn Baeza

Premier Scott Moe Announces Saskatchewan Will Be the ‘First Fully Carbon Tax-Free Province

Premier Scott Moe Announces Saskatchewan Will Be the 'First Fully Carbon Tax-Free Province

Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe recently made a bold announcement on social media platform X, declaring that the province will become the “first fully carbon tax–free province in Canada.”

In a video message, Moe explained that with the two major federal parties and their leaders outlining plans to eliminate the carbon tax, Saskatchewan is taking a further step by reducing the industrial carbon tax rate in the province to zero.

“This is a move that will offer immediate benefits to both consumers and industries,” Moe stated. “The removal of the carbon tax on SaskPower bills will save hundreds of dollars each year for both residents and businesses.”

Moe emphasized that this shift is also strategically important for the province’s industries, which will gain a competitive edge as the United States implements tariffs on Canadian goods. In the longer term, the removal of the carbon tax is expected to lower the cost of products across various sectors, as many consumer goods have the industrial carbon tax embedded in their prices.

Saskatchewan’s decision comes after years of advocacy from the provincial government, which has been pushing for the federal government to eliminate carbon pricing altogether. Last year, the province stopped collecting the carbon levy on natural gas following an exemption provided by Ottawa for home-heating oil users.

As Saskatchewan moves ahead with this new policy, it is positioning itself as a leader in challenging federal carbon pricing and promoting economic relief for its residents and industries.

March 27, 2025 Carolyn Baeza

Can an Accused Be Convicted in Lake Ontario Boat Crash If He Wasn’t Behind the Wheel

Can an Accused Be Convicted in Lake Ontario Boat Crash If He Wasn’t Behind the Wheel

Filip Grkovski’s defense lawyer is raising concerns over the direction of the prosecution’s case in his client’s trial. Grkovski, who is facing charges of criminal negligence and impaired operation causing death, stands accused in the tragic boat crash that occurred on May 31, 2022, near Outer Harbour Marina. The crash resulted in the deaths of two individuals, 24-year-old Megan Wu and 34-year-old Julio Abrantes, who drowned after being trapped in the overturned vessel.

During the trial, Grkovski’s lawyer, Alan Gold, questioned the legal strategy of the Crown, arguing that both he and his client were left in the dark regarding the prosecution’s theories of liability until the crucial moments of cross-examination. Gold explained to Superior Court Justice P. Tamara Sugunasiri that it wasn’t until Assistant Crown Attorney Jackson Foreman posed a series of questions to Grkovski that the defense became concerned.

Foreman suggested to Grkovski that even if he wasn’t the one driving the boat at the time of the crash, he could still be found guilty. This new line of questioning prompted Gold to express concern over the Crown’s evolving approach, particularly since their key witness, Edward Denkha, had previously testified that Grkovski was indeed the one behind the wheel.

Denkha, who took the stand on both Friday and Monday, claimed that Grkovski was angry after a fight with his girlfriend below deck and then emerged to take control of the boat, accelerating it at full speed before crashing into the rocks. Gold, however, strongly contested Denkha’s testimony, pointing out that no one else had seen Grkovski driving the boat and suggesting that Denkha himself might have been the one in control of the vessel at the time.

The trial continues, with both sides grappling over the facts and theories that could lead to a conviction.

March 26, 2025 Carolyn Baeza

Greenland Denies Inviting U.S. Delegation Amid Trump’s Claims

Greenland Denies Inviting U.S. Delegation Amid Trump’s Claims

The government of Greenland has refuted claims made by former President Donald Trump that it had invited a U.S. delegation, led by Usha Vance, to visit the island. Despite Trump’s assertions, Greenland’s authorities have clarified that no such invitation was extended.

Usha Vance, the wife of Vice President JD Vance, is scheduled to visit the self-governing Danish territory on Thursday, accompanied by one of their children, National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, and Energy Secretary Chris Wright. The visit is drawing attention as Trump intensifies his campaign to bring the world’s largest island under U.S. control, while Greenland’s leaders remain firm in resisting these attempts.

While Greenland is technically a part of Denmark, it operates with significant autonomy, including its own parliament. The Danish government oversees its foreign policy and provides substantial financial support to the territory.

On Tuesday, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen spoke out against the planned visit, condemning what she described as “unacceptable pressure” on both Greenland and Denmark. Speaking to Danish broadcaster TV 2, she made it clear that Denmark would resist such pressure.

Earlier this month, Trump had expressed his desire to acquire Greenland during a conversation with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte in the Oval Office, citing concerns about international security. In response to questions from reporters on Monday, Trump downplayed the controversy surrounding the visit. He stated that the upcoming trip was “not a provocation” but rather a gesture of “friendliness.” Trump further asserted, “We’re dealing with a lot of people from Greenland that would like to see something happen with respect to them being properly protected and taken care of. They’re calling us, we’re not calling them, and we were invited over there.”

Greenland’s denial of the invitation has raised further questions about the former president’s approach to international diplomacy and his ongoing attempts to gain influence over the territory

March 26, 2025 Carolyn Baeza

Ontario’s New Housing Minister Faces Scrutiny Over Opposition to Tower Proposal

Ontario’s New Housing Minister Faces Scrutiny Over Opposition to Tower Proposal

Ontario’s newly appointed Associate Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing is under fire after his comments during the recent provincial election seemed to contradict his current responsibilities. Graydon Smith, the Member of Provincial Parliament (MPP) for Parry Sound-Muskoka, was promoted to the position last week as part of Premier Doug Ford’s cabinet reshuffle. Smith’s new role includes overseeing modular homes and affordable housing initiatives, with a focus on Ontario’s ambitious goal of building 1.5 million new homes by 2031.

However, Smith’s remarks during the election campaign are raising questions about his commitment to addressing the province’s housing crisis. In a video posted on social media, Smith voiced strong opposition to a proposed 11-storey tower in his riding. “What would you think if an 11-storey tower was brought in right here in the middle of town?” he asked in the video. “Oh, and if you don’t like it, too bad—no appeals accepted. Completely crazy, right?”

This stance appears to run counter to the province’s need for denser housing, particularly as Ontario grapples with a mounting shortage of affordable homes and sluggish housing starts.

The Ontario NDP Leader, Marit Stiles, wasted no time in criticizing Smith’s position. She argued that his comments reflect a broader issue within the Ford government’s approach to housing. “This new associate minister does not have a track record of building the kind of housing that we need to see in this province,” Stiles said, pointing to Smith’s apparent reluctance to support more housing density.

Smith’s opposition to the tower proposal isn’t an isolated incident. Other Progressive Conservative figures, including Oakville Mayor Rob Burton, also voiced concerns over increasing housing density during the election. Burton, a supporter of Premier Ford, criticized proposals that would allow unlimited height near transit stations and the construction of fourplexes and four-storey buildings by right. He emphasized the importance of maintaining height limits and resisted calls for greater housing density in his own town.

The ongoing debate highlights the tension between local governments and provincial officials over the future of housing development. While the Ontario government has pledged to address the housing crisis, critics argue that many within the government remain opposed to the changes necessary to increase housing supply.

Ontario’s housing crisis continues to worsen, with housing starts seeing a significant decline. In February, new housing starts dropped by 36% compared to the previous year, and the overall trend this year shows a 33% decrease in new housing compared to 2024. Only nine of Ontario’s 50 largest municipalities have met their housing targets, and the province has thus far managed to start just under 73,000 of the 125,000 new homes it aimed to build in 2024.

The government’s own housing tracker suggests that the province is falling short of its goals, even as the housing crisis deepens. While the Ford government has recently made moves to address the issue—such as considering long-term care beds, basement apartments, and laneway homes as part of the housing count—many believe the current strategy isn’t enough to address the growing demand for affordable homes.

In defense of Smith’s position, a spokesperson from the Premier’s office argued that the new minister’s local knowledge made him uniquely qualified to understand the needs of his community. “Municipalities know best what works for their communities,” they said, noting Smith’s experience as a former mayor of Bracebridge.

But with the housing shortage showing no signs of abating, critics like Ontario Green Party Leader Mike Schreiner argue that the government needs to adopt a more proactive approach. “We need a government that’s going to say yes to housing,” Schreiner said, lamenting the Ford government’s failure to deliver on its housing promises.

The ongoing debate over housing density and the lack of progress in meeting housing targets raises important questions about the future of Ontario’s housing policy. Can the Ford government bridge the gap between local opposition and the urgent need for more housing? Or will the province continue to struggle with a housing crisis that seems to only get worse with each passing year? The answers to these questions will shape Ontario’s housing landscape for years to come.

March 25, 2025 Carolyn Baeza

Hints at Tariff Exemptions as April 2 Deadline Looms, Targets Narrow Group of Countries

Trump Hints at Tariff Exemptions as April 2 Deadline Looms, Targets Narrow Group of Countries

WASHINGTON — As the clock ticks toward April 2, the date U.S. President Donald Trump has dubbed “Liberation Day,” uncertainty surrounds the scope of his much-hyped reciprocal tariffs. While the administration initially positioned the move as a broad global response to unfair trade practices, Trump signaled Monday that some countries may be spared.

“I may give a lot of countries breaks,” Trump told reporters during a White House event, declining to specify which nations could see exemptions. His comments follow reports from Bloomberg and The Wall Street Journal suggesting the tariffs could end up being far narrower in focus — targeting only certain nations and sectors.

Targeted Tariffs on Deck

In addition to the reciprocal tariff plan, Trump said additional levies on automobiles, lumber, and semiconductors are in the pipeline. “We’ve been ripped off by every country,” he declared, asserting the new tariffs would raise “astronomical” revenue for the U.S., potentially allowing taxes to stay low or fall further.

The administration’s trade strategy, Trump insists, is already paying off. At the same press event, he announced Hyundai’s plans to build a steel plant in Louisiana and expand its auto manufacturing in Georgia — developments hailed as evidence that his tough approach is producing results.

Canada and Others Push for Exemptions

Canada, among other close allies, has been lobbying for exemptions from the new tariffs, as well as others already imposed earlier this month. Talks in Washington over the past several weeks have left Canadian officials “cautiously optimistic” that a deal might be reached.

However, with Canada’s trade deficit with the U.S. exceeding US$60 billion, it could land on the administration’s radar. That figure, however, is misleading — largely driven by energy imports. When energy is excluded, the U.S. actually runs a surplus with Canada.

Adding further uncertainty, April 2 also marks the expiration of a temporary exemption on auto parts and other goods traded under NAFTA rules. Those items have been subject to 25% tariffs since March 4, aimed at pressuring Canada and Mexico to crack down on fentanyl trafficking.

Election Politics in Play

Prime Minister Mark Carney, who launched a federal election campaign Sunday, commented from the campaign trail that meaningful negotiations with the U.S. may need to wait until after Canada’s April 28 election.

“The president is waiting for the outcome of the election to see who has a strong mandate from Canadians,” Carney told reporters in Gander, N.L. Under the caretaker convention, Carney can still respond to urgent issues, such as trade actions, even during the election period.

The “Dirty 15” Strategy

According to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and White House Economic Adviser Kevin Hassett, the April 2 tariffs will focus on a small group of countries with the highest trade surpluses and most protectionist barriers — the so-called “Dirty 15.”

“These are the worst offenders,” Bessent said in a recent Fox News interview, while Hassett suggested the real focus is on 10 to 15 nations that erect high tariffs and non-tariff barriers against U.S. goods.

Rather than triggering a global tariff war, Bessent suggested countries would be presented with a “reciprocal tariff number” — a benchmark based on their existing trade barriers. From there, they could negotiate down or eliminate the issue by reforming unfair practices.

“I’m optimistic that once countries see their number, they’ll want to talk,” Bessent said.

Expanding the Trade Front

Meanwhile, Trump extended his global trade crackdown on Monday by announcing secondary sanctions — including 25% tariffs on countries purchasing oil or gas from Venezuela.

Tariffs on foreign steel and aluminum remain in place, and Trump hinted at future tariffs on European goods and even pharmaceuticals, continuing his aggressive push to slash America’s US$1.2 trillion trade deficit.

As April 2 approaches, allies, trading partners, and U.S. businesses are bracing for impact — or hoping to be spared altogether. The question remains: who’s on the list, and who gets the break0.

March 25, 2025 Carolyn Baeza

Defence Suggests Witness, Not Accused, Was Driving in Fatal Lake Ontario Boat Crash

Defence Suggests Witness, Not Accused, Was Driving in Fatal Lake Ontario Boat Crash

TORONTO, ON — A key witness took the stand Monday, facing intense cross-examination as the defence suggested it was he — not the accused — who was behind the wheel during a tragic boating accident that left two people dead.

Eddie Denkha spent over three hours in a downtown Toronto courtroom denying he was driving the speedboat that slammed into rocks near Outer Harbour Marina on May 31, 2022. The violent collision flipped the vessel, trapping some passengers underneath. While eight people escaped, 24-year-old Megan Wu and 34-year-old Julio Abrantes drowned.

At the center of the trial is Filip Grkovski, a 41-year-old man from Mississauga. He faces eight charges, including two counts of criminal negligence causing death and impaired operation of a vessel causing death.

A Battle of Accounts

Grkovski’s lawyer, Alan Gold, painted Denkha as the real driver — and suggested his actions were reckless, possibly motivated by an attempt to impress Megan Wu, whom Denkha admitted he had romantic feelings for.

“No, that’s not what’s happening. She was sleeping,” Denkha responded, denying he was trying to show off.

Gold fired back: “Maybe if you woke her up, that would impress her.”

Denkha maintained his position: he was sitting near the helm with Wu and Abrantes, while four other women were below deck. He testified that Grkovski had been arguing with his girlfriend, Vanessa, before storming up to the deck in a rage.

“He was mad at Vanessa. He pulled out his cocaine, he pushed the throttle — he floored the boat,” Denkha said. “I told him to slow down.”

Moments later, the crash occurred. The boat flipped, chaos erupted, and two people never made it out.

Conflicting Testimonies

Denkha told the court he managed to swim out from under the capsized boat. When he surfaced, he saw Grkovski and two women already on the rocks.

However, other witnesses — including a police diver — have testified that Grkovski was in the water, not on the rocks, and was actively trying to rescue passengers trapped under the overturned boat.

With each witness, the trial is piecing together the events of that catastrophic evening on Lake Ontario — and whose hands were truly on the throttle when it all went wrong.

March 24, 2025 Carolyn Baeza

Alberta Premier Faces Backlash Over Call to U.S. to Delay Tariffs Until After Canadian Election

Alberta Premier Faces Backlash Over Call to U.S. to Delay Tariffs Until After Canadian Election

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith is under fire for comments made in an interview with the right-wing American media outlet Breitbart, in which she asked U.S. officials to pause tariffs on Canada until after the upcoming federal election.

In a March 8 interview with Breitbart’s Matthew Boyle, Smith claimed that Donald Trump’s trade actions—including recent tariffs—are unintentionally boosting Liberal support in Canada, while hurting Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre’s chances of becoming prime minister.

“Because of what we see as unjust and unfair tariffs, it’s actually caused an increase in support for the Liberals,” Smith said during the interview. “I would hope that we could put things on pause… Let’s get through the election. Let’s have the best person at the table make the argument for how they would deal with that—and I think that’s Pierre Poilievre.”

Smith’s direct appeal to a foreign government to delay economic measures until after a Canadian election has drawn sharp criticism, raising concerns about political interference and national sovereignty.

Political Fallout and Poll Impact

The backlash was swift, particularly given that Poilievre has been working to distance himself from both Trump and the Republican Party, amid rising voter anxiety over Trump’s aggressive trade stance and his repeated threats to undermine Canada’s sovereignty.

“Danielle Smith has the potential to be a big liability for Pierre Poilievre,” said Lori Williams, a political analyst at Mount Royal University in Calgary. “That’s been the case since she became premier—and perhaps even before.”

Poilievre avoided directly addressing Smith’s comments when asked on Sunday. Instead, he pointed to Trump’s own recent interview with Fox News, in which the former president reportedly said he believed it would be easier to negotiate with a Liberal government.

Meanwhile, a new Ipsos poll suggests that the Conservative lead has eroded significantly in recent weeks. If an election were held today, 42% of decided voters would support the Liberals, compared to 36% for the Conservatives—a seven-point swing in just three weeks.

A Shift in Tone

As Trump’s influence looms larger in the Canadian campaign, Poilievre has notably shifted his tone. Once focused on the mantra that “Canada is broken,” he’s now promoting a more optimistic message about unity and opportunity, vowing to “restore Canada’s promise.”

Smith, however, continued to align herself with the Trump worldview in her interview, criticizing former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s visit to Mar-A-Lago after the 2016 U.S. election and blaming him for Canada’s failure to meet NATO’s 2% defence spending target.

“[Trudeau] got us into a ditch,” Smith said, accusing him of leaving Canada economically vulnerable and diplomatically weak.

But critics say Smith’s remarks are a diplomatic misstep—one that may do more harm than good.

“Suggesting that a foreign government alter its economic policy to influence the outcome of a Canadian election is deeply problematic,” Williams said. “And aligning Poilievre with Trump’s administration—even if unintentionally—undercuts Poilievre’s efforts to present himself as independent of Trump’s influence.”

As federal leaders grapple with the economic fallout of Trump’s trade war and growing questions about Canadian sovereignty, Smith’s interview may have thrown an unexpected wrench into the Conservative campaign—and given their opponents fresh ammunition.

March 23, 2025 Carolyn Baeza

Mark Carney Triggers Federal Election, Sets April 28 as Voting Day

Mark Carney Triggers Federal Election, Sets April 28 as Voting Day

Canada is officially headed to the polls. Prime Minister Mark Carney has called a federal election for April 28, just nine days after being sworn in as the country’s new leader and succeeding Justin Trudeau as head of the Liberal Party.

Carney made the announcement Sunday after visiting Governor General Mary Simon to formally request the dissolution of Parliament, launching what promises to be a transformative—and high-stakes—election campaign.

“There is so much more to do to secure Canada, to invest in Canada, to build Canada, to unite Canada,” Carney told reporters in Ottawa. “That’s why I’m asking for a strong, positive mandate from my fellow Canadians.”

At the heart of Carney’s pitch is a direct response to growing economic threats from U.S. President Donald Trump, including what Carney described as “unjustified trade actions” and “threats to our sovereignty.” He emphasized the need for strong leadership to negotiate “the best deal for Canadians” amid rising cross-border tensions.

A Campaign of Change

This long-anticipated election is expected to dramatically shift the course of Canadian federal politics—regardless of which party wins.

Carney has already moved to distinguish his leadership from that of his predecessor. In a surprise early decision, he scrapped the federal consumer carbon price on March 14 and signaled a new direction on key economic and energy policies.

His chief rival, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, is also running on a promise of sweeping change. Poilievre has pledged to dismantle Trudeau-era policies, including:

  • Repealing the carbon pricing system for both consumers and industrial emitters

  • Overhauling immigration and taxation policies

  • Reducing the size of the federal public service

Poilievre, speaking from Gatineau, Quebec, vowed to restore Canada’s independence in the face of Trump’s escalating rhetoric.

“We don’t go looking for a fight,” he said, “but we’re ready if one comes looking for us.”

When asked whether he respects President Trump, Poilievre responded:

“I respect the office of the president of the United States. You can be respectful and firm—and I believe we have to be both.”

Trump as a Central Campaign Issue

Trump’s trade war with Canada—and his recent comments about Canadian sovereignty—are casting a long shadow over this election.

He has reportedly threatened to use “economic force” to pressure Canada into deeper integration with the United States, even suggesting Canada become the 51st state. That threat has made U.S.-Canada relations a central issue for every major federal party.

All federal leaders—Carney, Poilievre, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh, and Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet—are expected to center their campaigns on protecting Canadian autonomy and navigating the uncertain economic waters ahead.

As the campaign kicks off, the ballot question is becoming increasingly clear:
Who can best defend Canada’s interests on the world stage—and steer the country through a storm not of its own making?

March 23, 2025 Carolyn Baeza

Planning an Extended Trip to the U.S. Canada Updates Travel Advisory with New Registration Rules

Planning an Extended Trip to the U.S. Canada Updates Travel Advisory with New Registration Rules

Canadians planning longer stays in the United States—think snowbirds, extended vacations, or long-term visits—are being advised to take note: new registration requirements are coming into effect next month.

On Friday, the Canadian government updated its official travel advisory for the U.S., highlighting a key change that affects non-American visitors staying more than 30 days. Beginning April 11, Canadian citizens and other foreign nationals must register with the U.S. government if they plan to remain in the country for more than a month.

The policy stems from former U.S. President Donald Trump’s executive order titled “Protecting the American People Against Invasion,” signed on January 20. Though controversial in its wording, the rule introduces new travel obligations for foreign nationals—including Canadians—who are neither U.S. citizens nor permanent residents.

According to Canada’s advisory:

“Canadians and other foreign nationals visiting the United States for periods longer than 30 days must be registered with the United States government.”

And the consequences for skipping the paperwork?
Penalties, fines, and even misdemeanor charges could await those who don’t comply.

Immigration lawyer Rosanna Berardi notes that the regulation could have significant implications for Canadian snowbirds—those who head south to escape winter for weeks or months at a time.

If you’re planning to stay past the 30-day mark, it’s now more important than ever to stay informed and follow the new protocols. Because, as they say at the border, failure to declare can cost you.

March 23, 2025 Carolyn Baeza

Federal Election Set for April 28, Sources Confirm

Federal Election Set for April 28, Sources Confirm

Canada is heading back to the polls. According to sources with direct knowledge of the Prime Minister’s plans, a federal election will be held on April 28.

Prime Minister Mark Carney is expected to visit the Governor General on Sunday to formally launch the election campaign. Under Canadian law, the campaign must run for a minimum of 37 days, setting the clock ticking toward the late-April vote.

This move, confirmed by Global News, is designed to pre-empt an expected showdown in the House of Commons, where opposition parties have made it clear they would attempt to bring down the Liberal government at the earliest opportunity.

Poll Numbers Favor the Liberals

The timing of the election appears strategic.

Recent Ipsos polling, commissioned exclusively for Global News, shows the Liberals under Carney’s leadership pulling ahead of the Conservatives. The latest numbers, released Tuesday, indicate that 42% of decided voters would support the Liberals if an election were held today—compared to 36% for the Conservatives. That’s a seven-point surge for the Liberals in just three weeks.

This momentum suggests the Liberals could be positioning themselves for a majority government.

Carney’s personal popularity may be playing a key role. Another Ipsos poll released Thursday shows him as the only federal party leader with a net positive approval rating. According to the data:

  • 48% approve of Carney’s leadership

  • 30% disapprove

By contrast:

  • Pierre Poilievre, leader of the Conservative Party, holds a 35% approval rating, with a 52% disapproval rate

  • Jagmeet Singh, leader of the NDP, has 33% approval and 50% disapproval

What’s Next?

If the source proves correct, the writ will be dropped this Sunday, marking the official start of the campaign.

Get ready for rallies, debates, and lawn signs. With the Liberals on the offensive and the opposition sharpening their attacks, the next 37 days are shaping up to be a fiercely contested race for Canada’s future.

And April 28? It’s already circled on every campaign manager’s calendar.